Worked examples github.com

Is github.com vibe coded?

Enormous, old, and still shipping. We fetched the homepage on 29 August 2026 and ran all 86 detectors over the raw HTML — the same scan you get from the box on the front page, frozen here so the numbers can be argued with.

0/100

github.com

Hand-written

Somebody sat down and made decisions. Several of them were opinions.

Vibe tells
4
Craft tells
6
Confidence
high

Plenty of signal to work with.

Where the score came from

  • Platform fingerprintsnone

    Artefacts of the tool, not of taste

  • Colour, type and surfacenone

    The visual defaults, applied unedited

  • Layout and architecturenone

    The shape a page takes when nobody asks what it needs to say

  • Copy tells4 hits

    How the words were written

  • Leftoversnone

    Scaffolding never cleaned up

  • Source and buildnone

    What is visible in the shipped code

  • How it behavesnone

    Weight, mobile, accessibility, SEO — where the money leaks

  • Human craft6 hits

    Evidence of deliberate decisions

Evidence

10 findings
  • +16

    Large language model house style

    2 stock LLM marketing phrases.

    • in seconds
    • ai-powered
  • +14

    The weightless headline

    Grammatically confident, semantically empty — swap in any competitor's name and it still fits.

    • The future of building happens together
  • +9

    Copy that never says who it is for

    1100 words, and still no price, no contact route and no named audience. The page describes a category, not a business.

  • 9

    Deliberate social preview

    Open Graph title and image were both authored.

  • 9

    Skip-to-content link

    A keyboard skip link exists. Generators do not do this.

  • 7

    Hand-written ARIA

    64 explicit accessibility attributes.

What we read

title
GitHub · Change is constant. GitHub keeps you ahead. · GitHub
generator
server
github.com
status
200
html
560.4 KB
words
1,100
fetched in
186 ms
Open the page yourself

Reading this score

github.com landed on 7/100, which puts it in the hand-written band. That number is not a percentage and not a probability — it is strength of evidence: 18 points of tells, damped by craft, less 41 points of deliberate decisions, mapped through one logistic curve.

What pushed it up

What pulled it down

Craft we looked for and did not find

These are the actionable half of the report. None of them are hard, and every one of them would have moved the number.

What this scan cannot see

One request, no JavaScript executed. So everything below is invisible to us, and a page can be excellent or awful at all of it without moving the score:

Scan a URL of your own →